Wednesday, November 30 2005

This entry is a bit of meta-blogging - blogging about blogging. I try to avoid doing this, but blogging is an "industry" in serious need of a reality check, and while I'm hardly in a position to do so, I can at least take a nibble at the toes of it.

IMG_2627

Why I Blog

Firstly, to avoid the seeming hypocrisy of me criticizing blogs in a blog entry, I should answer the simple question why do I blog?

The easiest answer is that it's an on-the-record (e.g. searchable) archive of thoughts and technical explanations that I think are valuable (not to all people, but rather to some people, some of the time). Under my control and ownership, I am publishing thoughts and opinions for worldwide consumption. Not that everyone in the world - or even the tiniest percentage of it - is going to want to consume it, but it is accessible to most of the world. It beats posting thoughts on random discussion boards, to be edited or censored beyond my control, and for someone else's benefit.

Right now, for instance, with a relatively middling pagerank, Google is sending about 100 people a day from around the world here for their search terms (usually technical searches), followed far behind by a dogfight between Yahoo and MSN. I get a feeling of satisfaction knowing that I've (hopefully) helped people, whether it's implementing hierarchies in SQL Server, understanding the benefits of the new functionality of SourceSafe 2005, filter EXIF from their images or understand what value GPS will add to our digital photography, building Firefox extensions, or converting color schemes. On top of that, about 20x more get here daily via RSS readers, links, or bookmarks. More still have accessibility to these thoughts via aggregators.

Knowing that some people can get value from some of the entries is very satisfying to me. Most of the people will skim past and move on, but some will get genuine use out of it.

I also blog for reputation. To a small degree I am laying out who I am on here. I think I've demonstrated that I'm a fairly smart guy, with a lot of experience and a pragmatic perspective, and I have a given set of beliefs and perceptions. I've never attempted to pander to anyone: I've alternately offended both the pro-Linux and pro-Microsoft crowds, as well as the open-source and commercial software vendors: I am not a mouthpiece of someone's dogma, and while sometimes my opinion and perspective coincides, it doesn't indicate any alignment.

DSC02511

A lot of the people who I (along with associates and subcontractors) consult for (consulting on SQL Server, software architecture, Biztalk, Sharepoint, outsource software auditing, and custom software development in the Greater Toronto Area) - the real revenue generating side of yafla - view these pages, and it has been very beneficial.

Additionally (and most importantly to me) I am laying the communications groundwork for a product (Product X). I'm not into pushing vapour so I won't say anymore, but that is largely the selfish reason why I've sought PageRank and readers.

So that's why I blog. The fact that these are sequential, time-based entries is largely irrelevant (which is why I removed the time on the entries - it doesn't matter if I put this up at 1:32pm or 2:27pm) - ultimately it's just a convenient content management system with a usable delivery mechanism (RSS).

The Blogging World

Which brings me to blogging in general. <1% of the blog world, I would say, are interface blogs - they're information conduits - a one-way interface - between a business or project (or even celebrity) to consumers. Want to know what's up with SVG in Mozilla? Just read http://weblogs.mozillazine.org/tor/. If you want to know what's up with Web Services @Apache, just  visit http://ws.apache.org/blog/.

There are similar blogs for most software groups and technologies these days.

These sorts of blogs - often faceless blogs with little personality - can be tremendously valuable in keeping customers up to date on a project or product's happenings. They can even be internally beneficial in corporations as project or team façades. For instance "Project Life Admin Overhaul Project" with frequently added status updates: An on-the-record, historically-traceable, centralized location for information dissemination. This could be a Sharepoint site as easily as it could be a bonafide blog, but the purpose and value is exactly the same. The goal is usually to limit the scope to the product or project (no personal chatter about team lunch get togethers or funny cat incidents), and when something pops up the reader knows that it impacts the product.

Eventually as Project X is publicized here, a separate project blog will be created that contains nothing but product news. No pictures of my car rides, meta-blog comments, or random technical commentary.

Of the remaining 99% of blogs, a significant percentage are personal blogs that really aren't intended for anyone other than family members and close friends (and even they only visit when they're guilted into doing so. "Hey Tom...did you see my latest blog entry?").

The remainder is filled up with opinion blogs (blogs largely patronized by people who already drank the kool-aid, and they're just going there to surround themselves with like-minded far-Right or far-Left minded individuals): These blogs are vastly less influential than they are generally imagined to be, as their readership is already stuffed with the converted. The only people reading an Open Source Evangelism blog, for instance, are open source advocates. Joe VP isn't wandering in there when deciding what to base the next platform on.

The Meta-Bloggers

I left out one rather large group, which is bloggers that blog about blogging and bloggers - the meta-bloggers. This is a very, very large group of individuals. See Robert Scoble, strangely one of the most popular bloggers out there (something which I attribute to a "first mover advantage" - Robert was associated with some of the people who basically invented the concept of blogging, so he started getting the links early. Now that he's entrenched, and virtually no one really bothers linking anymore, he remains "powerful" among the blogging about blogging community). 90% of his blog is filled with either links to random stuff that other people are saying (there is very little original content in the blog world it sadly seems. It's easier to say "someone says..." than it is to actually say yourself. For every actual piece of content posted, there are probably 100 "someone said" blog entries), or talk about blogging.

If you look at his adoring community, and follow some of the backlinks, you discover a large, incestuous network of bloggers that are blogging about blogging, and linking to each others blog entries about blog entries about blog entries that talk about blogging about blogging on blogging with blogging. You even get people warning about blog "celebrities", like Scoble, releasing too much personal information. "As public interest in blogging grows, he can only get more famous." the blogger writes.

Give me a break. Bloggers are just so full of themselves.

While Scoble is surrounded by pro-Microsoft sycophants begging for a job at Microsoft, and has an adoring community of please-link-to-me advocates (9 times out of 10 you'll find the same incestuous link between Scoble and the sites he links to. Oh boy, I sure hope Scoble links here!), most of the world just doesn't care. Scoble's appeal is extraordinarily limited, and the idea of him being a celebrity among anyone other than a core group of Microsoft groupies and blog evangelists (the latter is a declining group - it really isn't an innovation anymore. The former will exist as long as there are people desperate to work for Microsoft) is delusional.

I commented in my notes regarding Microsoft's Launch 2005 event that one of the presenters asked who in the audience read the TechNet Canada blogs, and this was just another example of bloggers getting full of themselves. Of course they didn't - the audience reaction was almost entirely negative. Why would they? Why would some corporate developer trying to fight with SQL Server to solve a deadlock issue sit reading the blogs of a Canadian Microsoft technology evangelists (basically glorified salespeople)?

The idea is ludicrous, but there was that expectation, just as there's the flawed perception that the majority of people are eagerly and anxiously consuming blogs every day. It's a complete disconnect with reality, because people are grossly over-estimating the impact of blogs.

And this is the crux of blogging - It is a domain that has some definite uses, but in some ways it's a pyramid scheme: The illusion of the rising impact of bloggers is really just the blog community eating itself - selling itself to itself - all desperately tracking each other to lazily gain content for the next entry. "So and so said....here's my off the cuff take on that".

Sort of like this entry. Chomp!

   

Reader Comments

I'm so blogging this!
d- @ 12/5/2005 8:24:30 AM
Very well said - er blogged and long over due.
Jay Pondy @ 12/5/2005 4:31:53 PM
I came to your site via a few referals I saw in my logs (thanks for linking to me by the way). After reading this entry I can only imagine that some future-me wrote it, then you copied it and sent it back in time. In other words, your reasons for blogging are identical to mine. Though I don't post frequently, I do try to post information, that others may want to know in the hopes that Google will lead them to my site.

I also share your opinion on the meta-bloggers; Weinberger, Searls, Bricklin, etc. (in my news-reader, I label them "Preachy Tech," and click through only when I'm bored.)

However, you missed one valuable group: the luminaries. These are broad-minded, interesting people with respect from the community and the credentials to back it up. They will put forth on any number of subjects, but mostly stay focused on their specialties. I've labled them the A-List, and they include Tim Bray, Sam Ruby, Joel Spolsky, Jon Udell, and others.

Anyway, nice job. I'll be checking back.

Pete
Peter Lacey @ 12/5/2005 8:41:05 PM
Good day to you Pete.

Good point about the "A-list", however they represent such a minute percentage of the blogging world (from a content perspective) that they didn't even read on the scale. The whole "long-tail" thing tells us that we're all reading all sorts of content, and that is what drives the X million new blogs a month.

Of course the reality is that a very small number get the extraordinary percentage of traffic. I've watched some brilliant blogs by very insightful people languish, with their authors trying to whore readers however possible, but everyone was too busy sucking up to Joel to see what they can blog about him saying next.
Dennis Forbes @ 12/7/2005 6:31:48 PM
Hi Dennis,
Excellent post, I wholeheartedly agree with your sentiment.

In fact the woeful signal to noise ratio was one of the reasons why I was so hesitant about starting a blog in the first place. In the end, I got tired of hand writing html for how-tos and the like and just started.

I can't stand blogs that are full of links, as in the number of links should not be a significant portion of the post. They are pointless. If *you* don't have something to say, they you shouldn't be clicking the post/publish button.

Also, personal weblogs are just plain silly. Why fill the net with things that are of interest only to your friends and family. I have no problem with people who do it, once they clearly say "this is a personal weblog about my life" or something. However most of these people believe they are writing material of use to the general public. Some of them rival this one for signal to noise...
http://www.wibsite.com/wiblog/dull/

Maddox has a great take on blogs , which he wrote recently...
http://maddox.xmission.net/c.cgi?u=banish

Maybe you could start a "Zero Bullshit" accreditation that you can assess blogs and give them a nice sticker they can display if they choose to. Although, what would inevitably happen is people would follow the label on technorati or delicious , and soon enough the zero bullshit blogs would become full with posts about how the blog is really great, and then the cycle just repeats.

Nice post, well said. I'll be sure to read your stuff in future.

Des
Des Traynor @ 12/18/2005 5:20:45 PM

Add Comment

Name *:

Email Address:

(your email address is not displayed)
Website:

Comment *:



About the Author
Dennis Forbes Dennis Forbes is a Toronto-based software architect. While focused primarily on the .NET and SQL Server worlds, Dennis frequently ventures outside of this comfort zone into game development and image processing. He has been published in several industry magazines, has been quoted in the Wall Street Journal and has been interviewed by NPR.

He is a vice president and lead software architect at an innovative New York City hedge fund back-office services firm.

Dennis has been working on solutions for the financial, telecommunications, and power generation markets for over 15 years.





 

Dennis Forbes