Sunday, August 21 2011

Marc Andreeson has an interesting article in the WSJ titled Why Software Is Eating The World. I'm an egotist so let me take this opportunity to quote something I recently wrote-

Software Rules the World

RIMM right now will succeed or fail based upon their ability to pivot their software platform into something competitive.

Tens of billions of dollars of wealth relies upon some devs to toss together a decent experience in QNX.

Apple is worth $360 billion almost entirely owing to their software (despite all the [fawning] about the build quality of their hardware, their magic is 99% in software, 1% in hardware).

Google TV has failed thus far because the software was and to this point is [feces].

WebOS is failing because of software.

Software makes or breaks trillions of dollars worth of wealth.

Software is everything. Google can turn a significant profit on their Motorola venture -- without offending their partners -- simply by having Motorola toss Motoblur and it's illusory advantages into the garbage bin, and then hire loads of competent Android engineers to implement and specialize quickly for their devices. Motorola has been putting out hyper-competitive, solid hardware for years, but their failure has always been in software: Coming out with brand new handsets with Android 1.6 is not the mark of a company with a credible software division.

The same problems have seriously undermined both Dell and Sony Ericsson in the Android space — if you treat the software as something you just run an installer on right before shipping, your products will fail.

RIM needs to move move move. Neither Apple nor Android have the market in the bag, especially given that increasingly the industry is coming around to realize that web apps are actually pretty awesome, cross-platform solutions.

Software is more important today than ever. Mammoth international enterprises will rise or fall based upon the work of a small group of software developers.

   

Reader Comments

Your post isn't about Apple per se, and especially their build quality, but I nevertheless want to offer my pretty unscientific observations on the subject. The members of my particular research group (astronomy) at university (MSU) have exclusively used Apple computers. They rely on the Unix toolchain, and Windows is just too much of a toy, but at the same time they're scientists who want to get work done and not spend a lot of time fiddling with their OS. In that sense OS X is a nice compromise: sleek, reliable UI, with Unix power underneath. The problem? By my count, 100% of the Apple computers they've bought in the last 9 years have each failed in one way or another within 2 years. I do not claim that commodity PCs are much better (though, anecdotally the same department has several ancient eMachines that have soldiered on continuously for 9 years). I do, however, feel like with Apple, you don't get what you pay for.
David Ventimiglia @ 9/12/2011 3:35:25 PM

Add Comment

Name *:

Email Address:

(your email address is not displayed)
Website:

Comment *:



About the Author
Dennis Forbes Dennis Forbes is a Toronto-based software architect. While focused primarily on the .NET and SQL Server worlds, Dennis frequently ventures outside of this comfort zone into game development and image processing. He has been published in several industry magazines, has been quoted in the Wall Street Journal and has been interviewed by NPR.

He is a vice president and lead software architect at an innovative New York City hedge fund back-office services firm.

Dennis has been working on solutions for the financial, telecommunications, and power generation markets for over 15 years.





 

Dennis Forbes